Announcement:

TEA is now accepting applications( opens in new window) from qualified K–5 English and Spanish reading language arts, K–3 English and Spanish phonics, and K–12 math content experts interested in reviewing materials for the Instructional Materials Review and Approval (IMRA) Cycle 24. Visit the HB 1605 webpage( opens in new window) for more information about IMRA. The TRR reports for K–8 and high school science are now available. to support local adoptions.

Texas miVision Lectura - Grade 1

SLAR Grade 1 | 2020

Publisher: Savvas Learning

Series includes:

Quality Review

The quality review is the result of extensive evidence gathering and analysis by Texas educators of how well instructional materials satisfy the criteria for quality in the subject-specific rubric. Follow the links below to view the scores and read the evidence used to determine quality.

Standards Alignment

Rubric Section 1
TEKS and ELPS Alignment (percent of standards met in materials)
Percent of standards met in materials
Grade TEKS Student % TEKS Teacher % ELPS Student % ELPS Teacher %
Grade 1 100% 100% N/A N/A

Criteria for Quality

Rubric Section 2 Texts What students read, see, and hear Total TOTAL100% (12 out of 12 points) 100%
Section 2 Texts What students read, see, and hear Total 100% (12 out of 12 points)
2.1
Materials include high-quality texts for SLAR instruction and cover a range of student interests.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.2
Materials include a variety of text types and genres across content that meet the requirements of the SLAR TEKS for each grade level.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.3
Texts, including read-aloud texts in K-2 and shared reading in Grade 2, are appropriately challenging, and are at an appropriate level of complexity to support students at their grade level.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 3 Literacy Practices and Text Interactions: Reading, Writing, Speaking, Listening, Thinking, Inquiry and Research What students are asked to write, speak and demonstrate. Total TOTAL100% (46 out of 46 points) 100%
Section 3 Literacy Practices and Text Interactions: Reading, Writing, Speaking, Listening, Thinking, Inquiry and Research What students are asked to write, speak and demonstrate. Total 100% (46 out of 46 points)

3.A Reading: Questions and Tasks

3.A.1
Materials contain questions and tasks that support students in synthesizing knowledge and ideas to deepen understanding and identify and explain topics and themes.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.A.2
Materials contain questions and tasks that require students to evaluate the language, key ideas, details, craft, and structure of individual texts.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.A.3
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact with and build key academic vocabulary in and across texts.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.A.4
Materials include a clearly defined plan to support and hold students accountable as they engage in self-sustained reading.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.B Writing

3.B.1
Materials provide support for students to compose across text types for a variety of purposes and audiences.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.B.2
Materials engage students in the writing process to develop text in oral, pictorial, or written form.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.B.3
Over the course of the year, students are provided opportunities to apply grade-level standard Spanish conventions to their writing.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.B.4
Materials include practice for students to write legibly in print (K-1) and cursive (Grade 2).
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.C Speaking and Listening

3.C.1
Materials support students’ listening and speaking about texts.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.C.2
Materials engage students in collaborative discussions.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.D Inquiry and Research

3.D.1
Materials engage students in both short-term and sustained recursive inquiry processes for different purposes.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.E Integration of SLAR Skills

3.E.1
Materials contain interconnected tasks that build student knowledge.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.E.2
Materials provide spiraling and scaffolded practice.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 4 Developing and Sustaining Foundational Literacy Skills Total TOTAL100% (16 out of 16 points) 100%
Section 4 Developing and Sustaining Foundational Literacy Skills Total 100% (16 out of 16 points)
4.1
Materials provide explicit instruction in print concepts and opportunities for student practice (K-1 only).
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.2
Materials provide explicit instruction in phonological skills and opportunities for student daily practice (e.g., rhyming, syllabication, blending, segmenting, manipulation) (K-1 only).
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.3
Materials provide explicit systematic instruction in phonetic knowledge and opportunities for students to practice both in and out of context (K-2).
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.4
Materials provide frequent opportunities for students to practice and develop fluency while reading a wide variety of grade-level texts at the appropriate rate with accuracy and prosody. (Grades 1-2 only)
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 5 Program Monitoring Total TOTAL100% (6 out of 6 points) 100%
Section 5 Program Monitoring Total 100% (6 out of 6 points)
5.1
Materials include developmentally-appropriate diagnostic tools (e.g. formative and summative progress monitoring) and guidance for teachers, students, and administrators to monitor progress.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.2
Materials include guidance for teachers and administrators to analyze and respond to data from diagnostic tools.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.3
Materials include frequent, embedded opportunities for monitoring progress.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 6 Supports for All Learners Total TOTAL100% (4 out of 4 points) 100%
Section 6 Supports for All Learners Total 100% (4 out of 4 points)
6.1
Materials include guidance, scaffolds, supports, and extensions that maximize student learning potential.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.2
Materials provide a variety of instructional methods that appeal to a variety of learning interests and needs.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.3
Materials include supports for English Learners (ELs) to meet grade-level learning expectations.
Not scored

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 7 Implementation Total TOTAL90% (9 out of 10 points) 90%
Section 7 Implementation Total 90% (9 out of 10 points)
7.1
Materials include year-long plans with practice and review opportunities that support instruction.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.2
Materials include implementation support for teachers and administrators.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.3
Materials provide implementation guidance to meet variability in programmatic design and scheduling considerations.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.4
Materials provide guidance on fostering connections between home and school.
1 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.5
The visual design of student and teacher materials (whether in print or digital) is neither distracting nor chaotic.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 8 Bilingual Program Model Considerations Information Available. Section Not Scored.
Section 8 Bilingual Program Model Considerations Total 0% (0 out of 0 points)
8.1
Materials provide clear guidance specific to bilingual program model.
This item is not scored.

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

8.2
Materials support teachers in understanding the connection between content presented in each language and provide guidance on how to help students understand this connection.
This item is not scored.

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

8.3
Materials in Spanish are authentic and culturally relevant.
This item is not scored.

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 9 Additional Information Information not available.
Section 9 Additional Information Information not available.
9.1
Technology Specifications

9.2
Price Information

9.3
Professional Learning Opportunities

Program Information

Copyright Type
Proprietary
Print Version
Estimated number of pages:
Digital Version
Estimated number of click or scroll pages:
back to top